A Different Approach to Representation: Trabzon ‘Tekel’ Cigarette Factory
Year 2019,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 58 - 73, 30.12.2019
Yusuf Bilici
,
Aysu Akalın
Abstract
Although industrial buildings are important indicators of a country's socio-economic history, they often lose their functions due to rapid technological developments. The main subject of this article discussed is Trabzon Tekel Tobacco Factory which is built in two stages between the years 1951 to 1965 that is an industrial heritage and an important element of collective memory. According to the documents its function has been terminated in the 1990s but wanted to be revived in 2006 with a competition project in order to sustain the collective memory. However, during the competition and implementation phase, the building was completely demolished and rebuilt. In a world which we tend to create by destroying, it is expressed that we cannot ensure the sustainability of collective memory by demolishing the original and later building the exact copy of it at the same place or in another place.
References
- Adorno, T. W.(2005) ‘’Functionalism Today’’ in Leach, N., Rethinking Architecture J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005, pp.68–73.
- Bauman, Z.(2003). Modernlik ve Müphemlik, (çev.) İsmail Türkmen, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2003, pp. 20-22.
- Benjamin, W.(2012). Pasajlar, (çev.) Ahmet Cemal, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, p. 39-40, 42.
- Boym, S. (2001) The Future of Nostalgia, Basic Books, New York, p.18
- Büyükarslan, B.(2013). E.D. Güney, Re-Use Process of Industrial Heritage Building Case: "Tuz Ambarı" in İstanbul, Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (2), pp. 31-58.
- Cengizkan, N.M.(2002). Endüstri Arkeolojisinde Mimarlığın Yeri: Sanayinin Terkettiği Alanlarda “Yeniden Mimari”. Mimarlık, 308, p.40.
- Doğruel, S.(2000). Osmanlı’dan Günümüze TEKEL, TEKEL Yayını, İstanbul.
- Forty, A.(2001). Introduction, in Forty, A. Küchler, S. (ed.) Art of Forgetting, Berg Publishers, New York USA, 2001, p. 2.
- Kütük, S, Akalın, A.(2018). Ambivalence that Experienced Under the Name of Urban Transition-Transformation: Ankara Hamamönü as an Example of Historical Materialism, International Symposium on Urbanization and Environmental Problems: Transition / Transformation / Authenticity June 28-30, 2018, Eskişehir Turkey, p. 209.
- Loures , L. (2008). Industrial Heritage: the past in the future of the city. CIEO – Centro de Investigação sobre o Espaço e as Organizações, pp.687-696.
- Loures, L.(2008). Post-Industrial Landscapes: dereliction or heritage? 1st WSEAS International Conference on LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (LA '08), Algarve, Portugal, June 11-13, 2008, p.23
- Riegl, A.(2015). Modern Anıt Kültü (E. Ceylan, Çev.). İstanbul: Daimon Yayınları, p. 50
- Rossi, A.(1984). The Architecture of the City, The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass, p.6.
- Selfslagh, B.(2002). What future for our heritage? In: Heritage and Sustainable Development Council of Europe, Naturopa. Belgium: Bietlot – Gilly.
- Topaloğlu, G, Beşgen, A.(2017) A Tale of Collective Memory: What Trabzon Tekel Building and Its Environs Tell Us, İdealkent, pp: 694-714.
Year 2019,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 58 - 73, 30.12.2019
Yusuf Bilici
,
Aysu Akalın
References
- Adorno, T. W.(2005) ‘’Functionalism Today’’ in Leach, N., Rethinking Architecture J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005, pp.68–73.
- Bauman, Z.(2003). Modernlik ve Müphemlik, (çev.) İsmail Türkmen, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2003, pp. 20-22.
- Benjamin, W.(2012). Pasajlar, (çev.) Ahmet Cemal, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, p. 39-40, 42.
- Boym, S. (2001) The Future of Nostalgia, Basic Books, New York, p.18
- Büyükarslan, B.(2013). E.D. Güney, Re-Use Process of Industrial Heritage Building Case: "Tuz Ambarı" in İstanbul, Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (2), pp. 31-58.
- Cengizkan, N.M.(2002). Endüstri Arkeolojisinde Mimarlığın Yeri: Sanayinin Terkettiği Alanlarda “Yeniden Mimari”. Mimarlık, 308, p.40.
- Doğruel, S.(2000). Osmanlı’dan Günümüze TEKEL, TEKEL Yayını, İstanbul.
- Forty, A.(2001). Introduction, in Forty, A. Küchler, S. (ed.) Art of Forgetting, Berg Publishers, New York USA, 2001, p. 2.
- Kütük, S, Akalın, A.(2018). Ambivalence that Experienced Under the Name of Urban Transition-Transformation: Ankara Hamamönü as an Example of Historical Materialism, International Symposium on Urbanization and Environmental Problems: Transition / Transformation / Authenticity June 28-30, 2018, Eskişehir Turkey, p. 209.
- Loures , L. (2008). Industrial Heritage: the past in the future of the city. CIEO – Centro de Investigação sobre o Espaço e as Organizações, pp.687-696.
- Loures, L.(2008). Post-Industrial Landscapes: dereliction or heritage? 1st WSEAS International Conference on LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (LA '08), Algarve, Portugal, June 11-13, 2008, p.23
- Riegl, A.(2015). Modern Anıt Kültü (E. Ceylan, Çev.). İstanbul: Daimon Yayınları, p. 50
- Rossi, A.(1984). The Architecture of the City, The MIT Press Cambridge, Mass, p.6.
- Selfslagh, B.(2002). What future for our heritage? In: Heritage and Sustainable Development Council of Europe, Naturopa. Belgium: Bietlot – Gilly.
- Topaloğlu, G, Beşgen, A.(2017) A Tale of Collective Memory: What Trabzon Tekel Building and Its Environs Tell Us, İdealkent, pp: 694-714.