Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hybrid Nano-Composite Design for Nano-Architecture

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 74 - 85, 30.12.2019

Abstract

The aim of this research is to create a comparison and correlation between the treatments in medicine in terms of “bone regeneration”, the treatments in architecture in terms of “nanolime consolidation effects on limestone” and the treatments of aerospace technology in terms of anti-icing nano-coatings techniques in order to prevent the effect of freeze-thaw cycles in CH buildings. The criteria to be discussed related to these issues will be the porosity and mass transport between the correlation of human bone and limestone, and anti-icing nano-coatings between the correlation of aerospace engineering techniques to adopt into preserving CH buildings against the freeze thaw cycles.

The issue will be held in 2 main steps: 1ST Step: As reference to Faculty of Medicine: France; University of Orleans (Almhdie et al., 2014) on bone regeneration therapy: Absorption of compatible nano-chemicals (nano-silica Si02, HAP<200nm particle size, CaO, Ca(OH)2 nano-composite design) treatment to inner porous structure : limestone, in order to have mechanical strength and consolidation. 2ND Step : As reference to AIRBUS ICEPHOBIC Anti-icing Nano-Coatings Technology European Commission Project – Polytechnique Montreal Canada – Functional Coatings and Surface Engineering Laboratory (LaRFIS): Anti-icing icephobic nano-coatings of the porous structure (limestone) against the problem of freeze-thaw cycles and building material deterioration on cultural heritage buildings. (coatings made of silica nanoparticles).

Expected result of the 1st step nano-treatment is to gain mechanical strength and consolidation effect inside the building material, regarding as the main treatment. Then, in the 2nd step, regarding as the after treatment therapy with the anti-icing nano-coatings, the expected result will be to prevent the CH buildings against their well-known problem of freeze thaw cycles, caused by the thermal effects and the temperature differences between day and night, and summer-winter, especially in the regions where the humidity and rain factor are the basic factors for deterioration, caused the ice formation and the cracks inside the building material structure.
Research questions of this thesis; firstly, by using the techniques in medicine for “bone regeneration”; how to find a solution to the well-known two problems of the nanolime treatment in architecture ; reduced penetration and accumulation, whitened deposition. How to solve the problem of reduced penetration and accumulation in porous structures in order to increase the capability of their treatment efficiency?

How to solve the problem of whitened deposition in nanolime? Secondly, by using the techniques in aerospace technology, used by AIRBUS, for “anti-icing nano-coatings technology”; how to find a solution to the well-known problem of freeze-thaw cycles and ice-formation inside the building structure, that finally cause and effects the building material deterioration.

During the study, the discussion will be focus on the solutions for sustainability of nano-treatments in nano-architecture for future. The discussion points are; hybrid nano-composite design, “a simulation of bone regeneration in medicine”, in which ways and techniques? “HAP hydroxyapatite - SiO2 - Ca(OH)2” hybrid works well to solve the problem? Which hybrid nano-composite design could be the best solution? In which synthesis technique to form the hybrid nano-composites works better? Which criteria effects theefficiency? How to get a better penetration and consolidation in porous structures: “bone and limestone” ? How to avoid the back migration of nano-particles?

The idea of this research has application to patent for Politecnico di Milano POLIMI IRIS: 05.1. Brevetto & Patent Application: 2018. NANOTECHNOLOGY IN ARCHITECTURAL RESTORATION: SCIENCE & INNOVATION: Hybrid Nano - Composite Design for Consolidation of the Porous Structures: Limestone & Bone “Transport Phenomena”, ID: hdl:11311/1065405

References

  • A. Almhdie, O. Rozenbaum, E. Lespessailles, and R. Jennane, “Image processing for the non-destructive characterization of porous media. Application to limestones and trabecular bones,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 99, pp. 82–94, 2014.
  • A. Daehne and C. Herm, “Calcium hydroxide nanosols for the consolidation of porous building materials - results from EU-STONECORE,” Herit. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2013.
  • A. R. El-Ghannam, “Advanced bioceramic composite for bone tissue engineering: Design principles and structure- bioactivity relationship,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 69A, no. 3, pp. 490–501, 2004.
  • A. S. Campbell, “Consolidant Particle Transport in Limestone , Concrete and Bone,” no. March, 2013.
  • B. Thavornyutikarn, N. Chantarapanich, K. Sitthiseripratip,
  • C. A. Fernández, C. A. Martínez, M. O. Prado, D. Olmedo, and A. Ozols, “Bone Regeneration with Wharton’s Jelly- Bioceramic-Bioglass Composite,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 205–212, 2015.
  • C. Gao, S. Peng, P. Feng, and C. Shuai, “Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells,” Bone Res., vol. 5, no. October, pp. 1–33, 2017.
  • D. Durgalakshmi, S. P. Subhathirai, and S. Balakumar, “Nano-bioglass: A versatile antidote for bone tissue engineering problems,” Procedia Eng., vol. 92, pp. 2–8, 2014. D. J. Eaglesham, “The Nano Age?,” MRS Bull., vol. 30, no. 04, pp. 260–261, 2011.
  • E. Sassoni, E. Franzoni, B. Pigino, G. W. Scherer, and S. Naidu, “Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: Comparison with a TEOS- based consolidant,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, 2013.
  • E. Sassoni, “Hydroxyapatite And Other calcium phosphates for the conservation of cultural heritage: A review,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 4, 2018.
  • E. Sassoni, E. D’Amen, N. Roveri, G. W. Scherer, and E. Franzoni, “Photocatalytic hydroxyapatite-titania nanocomposites for preventive conservation of marble,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 364, no. 1, 2018.
  • E. S. Thian, J. Huang, S. M. Best, Z. H. Barber, and W. Bonfield, “Silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite: The next generation of bioactive coatings,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2007.
  • E. R. Whitbeck, G. D. Quinn, and B. Janet, “Effect of Calcium Hydroxide on the Fracture Resistance of Dentin,”
  • F. Gherardi, M. Roveri, S. Goidanich, and L. Toniolo, “Photocatalytic nanocomposites for the protection of European architectural heritage,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 1, 2018.
  • F. Pernot, P. Etienne, F. Boschet, and L. Datas, “Weibull Parameters and the Tensile Strength of Porous Phosphate Glass-Ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 641–648, 2010.
  • G. A. Thouas, and Q. Chen, Bone tissue engineering scaffolding: computer-aided scaffolding techniques, vol. 3, no. 2–4. 2014.
  • G. Borsoi et al., “Effect of solvent on nanolime transport within limestone: How to improve in-depth deposition,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 497, no. March 2016, pp. 171–181, 2016.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. Santos Silva, “Application Protocol for the Consolidation of Calcareous Substrates by the Use of Nanolimes: From Laboratory Research to Practice,” Restor. Build. Monum., vol. 0, no. 0, 2017.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. S. Silva, “Optimization of nanolime solvent for the consolidation of coarse porous limestone,” Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., vol. 122, no. 9, 2016.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. Santos Silva, “Evaluation of the effectiveness and compatibility of nanolime consolidants with improved properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 142, pp. 385–394, 2017.
  • G. Borsoi, M. Tavares, M. do R. Veiga, and A. S. Silva, “Microstructural and physical-mechanical analyses of the performance of nanostructured and other compatible consolidation products for historical renders,” Mater. Tehnol., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 223–226, 2012.
  • I. I. Congress and H. Monuments, “INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF MONUMENTS AND SITES (THE VENICE CHARTER 1964),” J. Obstet. Gynaecol. (Lahore)., vol. 31, p. 50, 2011.
  • J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 743– 749, 2011.
  • J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, “PHOBIC2ICE,” The European and Canadian researchers joined for new anti-ice application for aerospace, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.phobic2ice.com. [Accessed: 08-May-2018].
  • J. R. Jones, L. M. Ehrenfried, and L. L. Hench, “Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering,” vol. 27, pp. 964–973, 2006.
  • L. Bergamonti et al., “Nanocrystalline TiO2by sol-gel: Characterisation and photocatalytic activity on Modica and Comiso stones,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 282, pp. 165–173, 2013.
  • L.-C. Gerhardt and A. R. Boccaccini, “Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 3867–3910, 2010.
  • M. F. La Russa et al., “Nano-TiO2coatings for cultural heritage protection: The role of the binder on hydrophobic and self-cleaning efficacy,” Prog. Org. Coatings, vol. 91, pp. 1–8, 2016.
  • M. F. La Russa et al., “Testing the antibacterial activity of doped TiO2for preventing biodeterioration of cultural heritage building materials,” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., vol. 96, pp. 87–96, 2014.
  • M. J. Prince, “Back to the Future with Roman Architectural Concrete,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 3, no. Suppl 5, p. e001231, 2018.
  • N. A. Zarifah et al., “Effect of Hydroxyapatite Reinforced with 45S5 Glass on Physical, Structural and Mechanical Properties,” Procedia Chem., vol. 19, pp. 30–37, 2016.
  • PhD Dissertation: Nanostructured lime- based materials for the conservation of calcareous substrates, no. September 2017. 2017.
  • P. Louwakul, A. Saelo, and S. Khemaleelakul, “Efficacy of calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide nanoparticles on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis in human root dentin,” Clin. Oral Investig., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 865–871, 2017.
  • S. E. SUNGUR, “Nanotechnology in Architectural Restoration,” ITU Istanbul Technical University - Turkey, 2016.
  • Q. Fu, E. Saiz, M. N. Rahaman, and A. P. Tomsia, “Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives,” Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1245–1256, 2012.
  • W. Shih Ching, H. Hsueh Chuan, H. Sheng Hung, and H. Wen-Fu, “Preparation of porous 45S5 Bioglass??-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds by using rice husk as a porogen additive,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 20. pp. 1229–1236, 2009.
  • V. Crupi et al., “TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nanocomposite coating with self-cleaning effect for stone material: Finding the optimal amount of TiO2,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 166, no. March, pp. 464–471, 2018.
Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 74 - 85, 30.12.2019

Abstract

References

  • A. Almhdie, O. Rozenbaum, E. Lespessailles, and R. Jennane, “Image processing for the non-destructive characterization of porous media. Application to limestones and trabecular bones,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 99, pp. 82–94, 2014.
  • A. Daehne and C. Herm, “Calcium hydroxide nanosols for the consolidation of porous building materials - results from EU-STONECORE,” Herit. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2013.
  • A. R. El-Ghannam, “Advanced bioceramic composite for bone tissue engineering: Design principles and structure- bioactivity relationship,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 69A, no. 3, pp. 490–501, 2004.
  • A. S. Campbell, “Consolidant Particle Transport in Limestone , Concrete and Bone,” no. March, 2013.
  • B. Thavornyutikarn, N. Chantarapanich, K. Sitthiseripratip,
  • C. A. Fernández, C. A. Martínez, M. O. Prado, D. Olmedo, and A. Ozols, “Bone Regeneration with Wharton’s Jelly- Bioceramic-Bioglass Composite,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 205–212, 2015.
  • C. Gao, S. Peng, P. Feng, and C. Shuai, “Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells,” Bone Res., vol. 5, no. October, pp. 1–33, 2017.
  • D. Durgalakshmi, S. P. Subhathirai, and S. Balakumar, “Nano-bioglass: A versatile antidote for bone tissue engineering problems,” Procedia Eng., vol. 92, pp. 2–8, 2014. D. J. Eaglesham, “The Nano Age?,” MRS Bull., vol. 30, no. 04, pp. 260–261, 2011.
  • E. Sassoni, E. Franzoni, B. Pigino, G. W. Scherer, and S. Naidu, “Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: Comparison with a TEOS- based consolidant,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, 2013.
  • E. Sassoni, “Hydroxyapatite And Other calcium phosphates for the conservation of cultural heritage: A review,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 4, 2018.
  • E. Sassoni, E. D’Amen, N. Roveri, G. W. Scherer, and E. Franzoni, “Photocatalytic hydroxyapatite-titania nanocomposites for preventive conservation of marble,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 364, no. 1, 2018.
  • E. S. Thian, J. Huang, S. M. Best, Z. H. Barber, and W. Bonfield, “Silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite: The next generation of bioactive coatings,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2007.
  • E. R. Whitbeck, G. D. Quinn, and B. Janet, “Effect of Calcium Hydroxide on the Fracture Resistance of Dentin,”
  • F. Gherardi, M. Roveri, S. Goidanich, and L. Toniolo, “Photocatalytic nanocomposites for the protection of European architectural heritage,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 1, 2018.
  • F. Pernot, P. Etienne, F. Boschet, and L. Datas, “Weibull Parameters and the Tensile Strength of Porous Phosphate Glass-Ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 641–648, 2010.
  • G. A. Thouas, and Q. Chen, Bone tissue engineering scaffolding: computer-aided scaffolding techniques, vol. 3, no. 2–4. 2014.
  • G. Borsoi et al., “Effect of solvent on nanolime transport within limestone: How to improve in-depth deposition,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 497, no. March 2016, pp. 171–181, 2016.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. Santos Silva, “Application Protocol for the Consolidation of Calcareous Substrates by the Use of Nanolimes: From Laboratory Research to Practice,” Restor. Build. Monum., vol. 0, no. 0, 2017.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. S. Silva, “Optimization of nanolime solvent for the consolidation of coarse porous limestone,” Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., vol. 122, no. 9, 2016.
  • G. Borsoi, B. Lubelli, R. van Hees, R. Veiga, and A. Santos Silva, “Evaluation of the effectiveness and compatibility of nanolime consolidants with improved properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 142, pp. 385–394, 2017.
  • G. Borsoi, M. Tavares, M. do R. Veiga, and A. S. Silva, “Microstructural and physical-mechanical analyses of the performance of nanostructured and other compatible consolidation products for historical renders,” Mater. Tehnol., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 223–226, 2012.
  • I. I. Congress and H. Monuments, “INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF MONUMENTS AND SITES (THE VENICE CHARTER 1964),” J. Obstet. Gynaecol. (Lahore)., vol. 31, p. 50, 2011.
  • J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 743– 749, 2011.
  • J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, “PHOBIC2ICE,” The European and Canadian researchers joined for new anti-ice application for aerospace, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.phobic2ice.com. [Accessed: 08-May-2018].
  • J. R. Jones, L. M. Ehrenfried, and L. L. Hench, “Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering,” vol. 27, pp. 964–973, 2006.
  • L. Bergamonti et al., “Nanocrystalline TiO2by sol-gel: Characterisation and photocatalytic activity on Modica and Comiso stones,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 282, pp. 165–173, 2013.
  • L.-C. Gerhardt and A. R. Boccaccini, “Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 3867–3910, 2010.
  • M. F. La Russa et al., “Nano-TiO2coatings for cultural heritage protection: The role of the binder on hydrophobic and self-cleaning efficacy,” Prog. Org. Coatings, vol. 91, pp. 1–8, 2016.
  • M. F. La Russa et al., “Testing the antibacterial activity of doped TiO2for preventing biodeterioration of cultural heritage building materials,” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., vol. 96, pp. 87–96, 2014.
  • M. J. Prince, “Back to the Future with Roman Architectural Concrete,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 3, no. Suppl 5, p. e001231, 2018.
  • N. A. Zarifah et al., “Effect of Hydroxyapatite Reinforced with 45S5 Glass on Physical, Structural and Mechanical Properties,” Procedia Chem., vol. 19, pp. 30–37, 2016.
  • PhD Dissertation: Nanostructured lime- based materials for the conservation of calcareous substrates, no. September 2017. 2017.
  • P. Louwakul, A. Saelo, and S. Khemaleelakul, “Efficacy of calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide nanoparticles on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis in human root dentin,” Clin. Oral Investig., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 865–871, 2017.
  • S. E. SUNGUR, “Nanotechnology in Architectural Restoration,” ITU Istanbul Technical University - Turkey, 2016.
  • Q. Fu, E. Saiz, M. N. Rahaman, and A. P. Tomsia, “Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives,” Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1245–1256, 2012.
  • W. Shih Ching, H. Hsueh Chuan, H. Sheng Hung, and H. Wen-Fu, “Preparation of porous 45S5 Bioglass??-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds by using rice husk as a porogen additive,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 20. pp. 1229–1236, 2009.
  • V. Crupi et al., “TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nanocomposite coating with self-cleaning effect for stone material: Finding the optimal amount of TiO2,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 166, no. March, pp. 464–471, 2018.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Architecture
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Şelale Sungur

Publication Date December 30, 2019
Submission Date November 22, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Sungur, Ş. (2019). Hybrid Nano-Composite Design for Nano-Architecture. Modular Journal, 2(2), 74-85.